Privacy and Misuse of Private Information Essay - 1

Privacy and Misuse of Private Information - Essay Example Thus, basing to the case of Campbell v mirror group newspapers, Melinda has the bases for suing splat! Magazine due to the publication of her photos to the public without her consent, my advice would be in relation to the convention of human rights of Europe. According to the convention, there should be a ruling in favour of Melinda considering the tort in the English tort action relating to breaching of confidence as seen in this case. I would advise her to sue the company considering the provisions in the ECHR which upholds the rights that individuals have in relation to their family and private lives. Thus, the court should make a ruling in favour of Melinda because there is breach of privacy by the publication of the photos to the public as seen in the case of Douglas v. Hello, where Hello Company did publish wedding photos of Douglas without his consent leading to breach of human rights (Franklin, 2010). Relating to Baking! Magazine, the magazine had the right to publish Melinda ’s photos. Thus by the publication of the photos by splat! Magazine, there was misuse of private information. ... I would advise Baking! Magazine to take legal action against Splat! Magazine because in case, the claimant has an expectation which is reasonable to privacy regarding the information under disclosure, Melinda expects the Baking! Magazine to publish the photos that are showing her better self but Splat! Magazine goes ahead and publishes the photos that show the unpleasant side of Melinda; thus the initial magazine considers the person’s right to privy more than the second magazine’s freedom of expression. Further, the court may rule that, Splat! Magazine is not liable because the photographs were under publication of peripherals that require publication showing the bright side of Melinda. Thus, the magazine did the publication with appreciation to the well being of Melinda’s image. Hence, I would advise the initial magazine to go ahead and sue for aforementioned confidence breach, which is under the clause of human rights rules and regulations relating to privacy. This is as seen in the case of the Prince of Wales v. Associated newspaper, where the newspaper took the diary of the prince and made a publication which was embarrassing to the Prince. In the case, it is clear that there is breach in the right of privacy of the Prince (Daniel, 2008). Under the law, for the case to be valid, there should be impacting of information in circumstances that impose the obligation of confidence. Where Melinda can sue for giving out of private information by Splat! Magazine. The information which the magazine gives out includes photos that Melinda does not know of their existence, this arises to infringement of privacy where the magazine was stalking Melinda even in the supermarket so as to get her photos. They also take Melinda’s photographs that are demeaning in that